ghsa-pf4h-wcfc-95m7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-07-31 15:35
Modified
2025-07-31 15:35
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in freeFTPd version 1.0.10 and earlier in the handling of the FTP PASS command. When an attacker sends a specially crafted password string, the application fails to validate input length, resulting in memory corruption. This can lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution. Exploitation requires the anonymous user account to be enabled.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-10042" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-121" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-31T15:15:34Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in freeFTPd version 1.0.10 and earlier in the handling of the FTP PASS command. When an attacker sends a specially crafted password string, the application fails to validate input length, resulting in memory corruption. This can lead to denial of service or arbitrary code execution. Exploitation requires the anonymous user account to be enabled.", "id": "GHSA-pf4h-wcfc-95m7", "modified": "2025-07-31T15:35:50Z", "published": "2025-07-31T15:35:50Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-10042" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/master/modules/exploits/windows/ftp/freeftpd_pass.rb" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/27747" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freeftpd-pass-command-stack-based-buffer-overflow" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X", "type": "CVSS_V4" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…