ghsa-pcph-v7q2-77cx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:04
Modified
2022-05-14 03:04
Severity ?
Details
INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE commands in PostgreSQL 10.x before 10.1, 9.6.x before 9.6.6, and 9.5.x before 9.5.10 disclose table contents that the invoker lacks privilege to read. These exploits affect only tables where the attacker lacks full read access but has both INSERT and UPDATE privileges. Exploits bypass row level security policies and lack of SELECT privilege.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-15099", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-200", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-11-22T18:29:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE commands in PostgreSQL 10.x before 10.1, 9.6.x before 9.6.6, and 9.5.x before 9.5.10 disclose table contents that the invoker lacks privilege to read. These exploits affect only tables where the attacker lacks full read access but has both INSERT and UPDATE privileges. Exploits bypass row level security policies and lack of SELECT privilege.", id: "GHSA-pcph-v7q2-77cx", modified: "2022-05-14T03:04:24Z", published: "2022-05-14T03:04:24Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15099", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2511", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2566", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4028", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1801", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.postgresql.org/support/security", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101781", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039752", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.