GHSA-P3VC-36G9-X9GR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 16:52 – Updated: 2026-06-15 16:52
VLAI
Summary
@angular/common: Denial of Service (DoS) via OOM in Number Formatting (digitsInfo)
Details

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the @angular/common package of Angular. The formatNumber function, which is also utilized by DecimalPipe, PercentPipe, and CurrencyPipe, does not properly validate the upper bounds of the digitsInfo parameter. Specifically, the minimum and maximum fraction digits parsed from the digitsInfo string (e.g., 1.2-4) are converted to integers and used without limits.

When parsing a maliciously crafted digitsInfo string with excessively large fraction digit values (e.g., 1.200000000-200000000), the internal roundNumber function attempts to pad the digits array to match the requested fraction size. This results in an unbounded loop that repeatedly pushes elements into an array.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger resource exhaustion, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS):

  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR): In applications using SSR (e.g., @angular/ssr), an attacker can crash the Node.js server process due to a JavaScript heap out of memory error. This affects the availability of the application for all users.
  • Client-Side Rendering (CSR): In standard client-side applications, the unbounded loop will block the main thread, freezing the user's browser tab and making it unresponsive.

Attack Preconditions

For this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met:

  1. Vulnerable Component Usage: The application must use Angular's number formatting utilities, such as the formatNumber function directly, or via template pipes (DecimalPipe, PercentPipe, CurrencyPipe).
  2. Attacker-Controlled Parameter: The digitsInfo parameter passed to these utilities must be customizable or directly controlled by untrusted user input (e.g., parsed from query parameters, user preference settings, or API responses that accept user-defined formatting options). If digitsInfo is trusted or limited to a known, defined range for its value, the vulnerability is not exploitable by external attackers.

Patches

  • 22.0.0-rc.2
  • 21.2.15
  • 20.3.22
  • 19.2.23

Credits

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by CodeMender from Google DeepMind.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@angular/common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "22.0.0-next.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "22.0.0-rc.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@angular/common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "20.0.0-next.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "20.3.22"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@angular/common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "19.0.0-next.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "19.2.23"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@angular/common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "18.2.14"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@angular/common"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "21.0.0-next.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "21.2.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-50171"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-400",
      "CWE-834"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T16:52:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of Angular. The `formatNumber` function, which is also utilized by `DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, and `CurrencyPipe`, does not properly validate the upper bounds of the `digitsInfo` parameter. Specifically, the minimum and maximum fraction digits parsed from the `digitsInfo` string (e.g., `1.2-4`) are converted to integers and used without limits.\n\nWhen parsing a maliciously crafted `digitsInfo` string with excessively large fraction digit values (e.g., `1.200000000-200000000`), the internal `roundNumber` function attempts to pad the digits array to match the requested fraction size. This results in an unbounded loop that repeatedly pushes elements into an array.\n\n### Impact\n\nSuccessful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger resource exhaustion, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS):\n\n* **Server-Side Rendering (SSR):** In applications using SSR (e.g., `@angular/ssr`), an attacker can crash the Node.js server process due to a `JavaScript heap out of memory` error. This affects the availability of the application for all users.  \n* **Client-Side Rendering (CSR):** In standard client-side applications, the unbounded loop will block the main thread, freezing the user\u0027s browser tab and making it unresponsive.\n\n### Attack Preconditions\n\nFor this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met:\n\n1. **Vulnerable Component Usage:** The application must use Angular\u0027s number formatting utilities, such as the `formatNumber` function directly, or via template pipes (`DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, `CurrencyPipe`).  \n2. **Attacker-Controlled Parameter:** The `digitsInfo` parameter passed to these utilities must be customizable or directly controlled by untrusted user input (e.g., parsed from query parameters, user preference settings, or API responses that accept user-defined formatting options). If `digitsInfo` is trusted or limited to a known, defined range for its value, the vulnerability is not exploitable by external attackers.\n\n### Patches\n- 22.0.0-rc.2\n- 21.2.15\n- 20.3.22\n- 19.2.23\n\n### Credits\nThis vulnerability was discovered and reported by [CodeMender from Google DeepMind](https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/).",
  "id": "GHSA-p3vc-36g9-x9gr",
  "modified": "2026-06-15T16:52:30Z",
  "published": "2026-06-15T16:52:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-p3vc-36g9-x9gr"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68840"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/angular/angular"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@angular/common: Denial of Service (DoS) via OOM in Number Formatting (digitsInfo)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…