ghsa-p3px-2xx5-xmgx
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:47
Modified
2025-04-20 03:38
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
smbd in Samba before 4.4.10 and 4.5.x before 4.5.6 has a denial of service vulnerability (fd_open_atomic infinite loop with high CPU usage and memory consumption) due to wrongly handling dangling symlinks.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-9461"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-835"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-06-06T21:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "smbd in Samba before 4.4.10 and 4.5.x before 4.5.6 has a denial of service vulnerability (fd_open_atomic infinite loop with high CPU usage and memory consumption) due to wrongly handling dangling symlinks.",
"id": "GHSA-p3px-2xx5-xmgx",
"modified": "2025-04-20T03:38:32Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:47:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9461"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1950"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2778"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.debian.org/864291"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12572"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=10c3e3923022485c720f322ca4f0aca5d7501310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=10c3e3923022485c720f322ca4f0aca5d7501310"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/04/msg00013.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99455"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…