GHSA-MXC8-68WC-4VVM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
cxl/region: Fix out-of-bounds access in cxl_cancel_auto_attach()
In cxl_cancel_auto_attach(), it assumes cxled->pos is a valid index for accessing p->targets[]. However, cxled->pos can be set to negative errno in cxl_region_sort_targets() if cxl_calc_interleave_pos() fails. This causes the driver to use a negative index to access p->targets[], resulting in out-of-bounds access.
Fix it by walking p->targets[] instead of using cxled->pos directly.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-74275"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:26Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncxl/region: Fix out-of-bounds access in cxl_cancel_auto_attach()\n\nIn cxl_cancel_auto_attach(), it assumes cxled-\u003epos is a valid index for\naccessing p-\u003etargets[]. However, cxled-\u003epos can be set to negative errno\nin cxl_region_sort_targets() if cxl_calc_interleave_pos() fails. This\ncauses the driver to use a negative index to access p-\u003etargets[],\nresulting in out-of-bounds access.\n\nFix it by walking p-\u003etargets[] instead of using cxled-\u003epos directly.",
"id": "GHSA-mxc8-68wc-4vvm",
"modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:35Z",
"published": "2026-08-15T06:32:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74275"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44b2397eb67b7f728640989a22d062e41f94ab64"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbda6a2c2bec2a5fb30a2ce85baeab15b5fc7db3"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.