ghsa-mwf3-rpq5-x552
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 16:59
Modified
2022-05-24 16:59
Details
browser/extensions/api/dial/dial_registry.cc in Google Chrome before 54.0.2840.98 on macOS, before 54.0.2840.99 on Windows, and before 54.0.2840.100 on Linux neglects to copy a device ID before an erase() call, which causes the erase operation to access data that that erase operation will destroy.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2016-5202" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-732" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2019-10-25T15:15:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "browser/extensions/api/dial/dial_registry.cc in Google Chrome before 54.0.2840.98 on macOS, before 54.0.2840.99 on Windows, and before 54.0.2840.100 on Linux neglects to copy a device ID before an erase() call, which causes the erase operation to access data that that erase operation will destroy.", "id": "GHSA-mwf3-rpq5-x552", "modified": "2022-05-24T16:59:52Z", "published": "2022-05-24T16:59:52Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5202" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=658106#c36" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-5202" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-5202" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2016/11/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_9.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/2436403003" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://crbug.com/656073" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://crbug.com/662843" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-5202" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-11/msg00029.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.