GHSA-MVG8-4W53-3C5G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 09:31 – Updated: 2026-07-10 09:31
VLAI
Details

The GoodMeet – Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting & Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user's capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin's stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.

Severity
4.3 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-6440"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-10T09:16:53Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The GoodMeet \u2013 Google Meet Integration for Webinar, Meeting \u0026 Video Conference plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to and including 1.1.8. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the reset_credential() function, which handles the wp_ajax_goodmeet_reset_google_meet_credential AJAX action. While the function does verify the user\u0027s capability (manage_options), it does not validate a nonce, making it susceptible to CSRF attacks. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link that will reset (delete) the plugin\u0027s stored Google Meet API credentials (goodmeet_google_credentials) and OAuth tokens (goodmeet_google_token), effectively disabling the Google Meet integration on the site.",
  "id": "GHSA-mvg8-4w53-3c5g",
  "modified": "2026-07-10T09:31:38Z",
  "published": "2026-07-10T09:31:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6440"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L140"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/tags/1.1.6/includes/Googlemeet/Goodmeet_Meet.php#L544"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L140"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Goodmeet_Ajax.php#L38"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/goodmeet/trunk/includes/Googlemeet/Goodmeet_Meet.php#L544"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=\u0026old=3525854%40goodmeet\u0026new=3525854%40goodmeet"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dc9e818d-811e-4732-9c74-8eb6753a1706?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.