GHSA-MRF2-HC9C-229V
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval
I noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report 1.
A rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:
table ip t {
chain pre {
type filter hook prerouting priority raw;
ct zone set 1
ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept
}
}
The first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via nft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -> kzalloc, tuple is all zero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls nft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct and hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this overflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller dreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.
Reject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(), mirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally, bound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv->len instead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple before pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading bytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple->{src,dst}.u3.all are well-defined zero. priv->len is validated at rule load, so the copy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than by an untrusted field on the conntrack.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53267"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:44Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: nft_ct: bail out on template ct in get eval\n\nI noticed this issue while looking at a historic syzbot report [1].\n\nA rule like the one below is enough to trigger the bug:\n\n table ip t {\n chain pre {\n type filter hook prerouting priority raw;\n ct zone set 1\n ct original saddr 1.2.3.4 accept\n }\n }\n\nThe first expression attaches a per-cpu template ct via\nnft_ct_set_zone_eval() (nf_ct_tmpl_alloc -\u003e kzalloc, tuple is all\nzero, nf_ct_l3num(ct) == 0). The next expression then calls\nnft_ct_get_eval() on the same skb, treats the template as a real ct\nand hits the 16-byte memcpy path. With dreg at NFT_REG32_15 this\noverflows past struct nft_regs on the kernel stack; with smaller\ndreg values it silently clobbers adjacent registers.\n\nReject template ct at the eval entry and in nft_ct_get_fast_eval(),\nmirroring the check nft_ct_set_eval() already has. Additionally,\nbound the address copy in NFT_CT_SRC / NFT_CT_DST by priv-\u003elen\ninstead of by nf_ct_l3num(ct): nf_ct_get_tuple() zeroes the tuple\nbefore pkt_to_tuple() fills in only the protocol-relevant leading\nbytes, so the trailing bytes of tuple-\u003e{src,dst}.u3.all are\nwell-defined zero. priv-\u003elen is validated at rule load, so the\ncopy size is now bounded by the destination register rather than\nby an untrusted field on the conntrack.\n\n[1]: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=389cf09cb72926114fce90dc85a2c3231dcb647c",
"id": "GHSA-mrf2-hc9c-229v",
"modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:47Z",
"published": "2026-06-25T09:31:23Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53267"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e154b5f53f1b0b490c7b8b02499f90feb86b1d5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3027ecbdb5fdf9200251c21d4818e4c447ef78e1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8470f676eadeab99132708acb1a85915664d6115"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af80f78ce984649e1698b841cd33f4fa505ad828"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f071b0bf078146368d18e4eec386bf2ddc0ab7e0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.