ghsa-mpv4-c8cf-72rm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-29 02:58
Modified
2022-04-29 02:58
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in libXML 2.6.12 and 2.6.13 (libxml2), and possibly other versions, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long FTP URL that is not properly handled by the xmlNanoFTPScanURL function, (2) a long proxy URL containing FTP data that is not properly handled by the xmlNanoFTPScanProxy function, and other overflows related to manipulation of DNS length values, including (3) xmlNanoFTPConnect, (4) xmlNanoHTTPConnectHost, and (5) xmlNanoHTTPConnectHost.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0989"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-03-01T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in libXML 2.6.12 and 2.6.13 (libxml2), and possibly other versions, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long FTP URL that is not properly handled by the xmlNanoFTPScanURL function, (2) a long proxy URL containing FTP data that is not properly handled by the xmlNanoFTPScanProxy function, and other overflows related to manipulation of DNS length values, including (3) xmlNanoFTPConnect, (4) xmlNanoHTTPConnectHost, and (5) xmlNanoHTTPConnectHost.",
  "id": "GHSA-mpv4-c8cf-72rm",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:45Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0989"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17870"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17872"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17875"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17876"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10505"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1173"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-89-1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000890"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2005/Jan/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=109880813013482\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/13000"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1011941"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/p-029.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-582"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-05.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_01_sr.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/11179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/11180"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/11324"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-615.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2004-650.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11526"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.