ghsa-mpqx-63fh-p5mj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-23 00:40
Modified
2022-04-23 00:40
Details

cgi-bin/userprefs.cgi in Plixer International Scrutinizer NetFlow & sFlow Analyzer before 9.0.1.19899 does not validate user permissions, which allow remote attackers to add user accounts with administrator privileges via the newuser, pwd, and selectedUserGroup parameters.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2012-1258"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-01-09T20:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "cgi-bin/userprefs.cgi in Plixer International Scrutinizer NetFlow \u0026 sFlow Analyzer before 9.0.1.19899 does not validate user permissions, which allow remote attackers to add user accounts with administrator privileges via the newuser, pwd, and selectedUserGroup parameters.",
  "id": "GHSA-mpqx-63fh-p5mj",
  "modified": "2022-04-23T00:40:28Z",
  "published": "2022-04-23T00:40:28Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1258"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74824"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.trustwave.com/en-us/resources/blogs/spiderlabs-blog/twsl2012-008-multiple-vulnerabilities-in-scrutinizer-netflow-sflow-analyzer"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/111791/Scrutinizer-8.6.2-Bypass-Cross-Site-Scripting-SQL-Injection.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18750"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52989"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.