ghsa-mhw9-v228-5c8f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-08-07 06:30
Modified
2025-08-07 06:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in Akamai Ghost, as used for the Akamai CDN platform before 2025-03-26. Under certain circumstances, a client making an HTTP/1.x OPTIONS request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header, and using obsolete line folding, can lead to a discrepancy in how two in-path Akamai servers interpret the request, allowing an attacker to smuggle a second request in the original request body.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-32094" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-444" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-08-07T05:15:45Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "An issue was discovered in Akamai Ghost, as used for the Akamai CDN platform before 2025-03-26. Under certain circumstances, a client making an HTTP/1.x OPTIONS request with an \"Expect: 100-continue\" header, and using obsolete line folding, can lead to a discrepancy in how two in-path Akamai servers interpret the request, allowing an attacker to smuggle a second request in the original request body.", "id": "GHSA-mhw9-v228-5c8f", "modified": "2025-08-07T06:30:30Z", "published": "2025-08-07T06:30:30Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32094" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/Status/100" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.akamai.com/blog/security/cve-2025-32094-http-request-smuggling" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.blackhat.com/us-25/briefings/schedule/#http1-must-die-the-desync-endgame-45103" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#name-obsolete-line-folding" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…