ghsa-mh6v-rgfm-g694
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:46
Modified
2022-05-01 01:46
Details

The DNS implementation of PowerDNS 2.9.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a compressed DNS packet with a label length byte with an incorrect offset, which could trigger an infinite loop.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-0038"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The DNS implementation of PowerDNS 2.9.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a compressed DNS packet with a label length byte with an incorrect offset, which could trigger an infinite loop.",
  "id": "GHSA-mh6v-rgfm-g694",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:46:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:46:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0038"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.niscc.gov.uk/niscc/docs/al-20050524-00433.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.niscc.gov.uk/niscc/docs/re-20050524-00432.pdf?lang=en"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/25291"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/13729"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.