ghsa-mg4j-hgc5-ggv5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:24
Modified
2022-05-13 01:24
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Nanopool Claymore Dual Miner version 7.3 and earlier contains a remote code execution vulnerability by abusing the miner API. The flaw can be exploited only if the software is executed with read/write mode enabled.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2018-1000049"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2018-02-09T23:29:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Nanopool Claymore Dual Miner version 7.3 and earlier contains a remote code execution vulnerability by abusing the miner API. The flaw can be exploited only if the software is executed with read/write mode enabled.",
"id": "GHSA-mg4j-hgc5-ggv5",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:24:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:24:58Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000049"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/distributedweaknessfiling/cvelist/master/2018/1000xxx/CVE-2018-1000049.json"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://reversebrain.github.io/2018/02/01/Claymore-Dual-Miner-Remote-Code-Execution"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://twitter.com/ReverseBrain/status/951850534985662464"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44638"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/147678/Nanopool-Claymore-Dual-Miner-7.3-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/148578/Nanopool-Claymore-Dual-Miner-APIs-Remote-Code-Execution.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/exploit/multi/misc/claymore_dual_miner_remote_manager_rce"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…