ghsa-m9m2-8mh5-2h2v
Vulnerability from github
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
liquidio: Adjust a NULL pointer handling path in lio_vf_rep_copy_packet
In lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() pg_info->page is compared to a NULL value, but then it is unconditionally passed to skb_add_rx_frag() which looks strange and could lead to null pointer dereference.
lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() call trace looks like: octeon_droq_process_packets octeon_droq_fast_process_packets octeon_droq_dispatch_pkt octeon_create_recv_info ...search in the dispatch_list... ->disp_fn(rdisp->rinfo, ...) lio_vf_rep_pkt_recv(struct octeon_recv_info *recv_info, ...) In this path there is no code which sets pg_info->page to NULL. So this check looks unneeded and doesn't solve potential problem. But I guess the author had reason to add a check and I have no such card and can't do real test. In addition, the code in the function liquidio_push_packet() in liquidio/lio_core.c does exactly the same.
Based on this, I consider the most acceptable compromise solution to adjust this issue by moving skb_add_rx_frag() into conditional scope.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39506"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-476"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-12T13:15:12Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nliquidio: Adjust a NULL pointer handling path in lio_vf_rep_copy_packet\n\nIn lio_vf_rep_copy_packet() pg_info-\u003epage is compared to a NULL value,\nbut then it is unconditionally passed to skb_add_rx_frag() which looks\nstrange and could lead to null pointer dereference.\n\nlio_vf_rep_copy_packet() call trace looks like:\n\tocteon_droq_process_packets\n\t octeon_droq_fast_process_packets\n\t octeon_droq_dispatch_pkt\n\t octeon_create_recv_info\n\t ...search in the dispatch_list...\n\t -\u003edisp_fn(rdisp-\u003erinfo, ...)\n\t lio_vf_rep_pkt_recv(struct octeon_recv_info *recv_info, ...)\nIn this path there is no code which sets pg_info-\u003epage to NULL.\nSo this check looks unneeded and doesn\u0027t solve potential problem.\nBut I guess the author had reason to add a check and I have no such card\nand can\u0027t do real test.\nIn addition, the code in the function liquidio_push_packet() in\nliquidio/lio_core.c does exactly the same.\n\nBased on this, I consider the most acceptable compromise solution to\nadjust this issue by moving skb_add_rx_frag() into conditional scope.\n\nFound by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.",
"id": "GHSA-m9m2-8mh5-2h2v",
"modified": "2024-08-28T21:31:27Z",
"published": "2024-07-12T15:31:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39506"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/87d6bdc006f0cbf297a3b2ad6e40ede4c3ee5dc2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6f4d0ec170a46b5f453cacf55dff5989b42bbfa"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a86490a3712cc513113440a606a0e77130abd47c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c44711b78608c98a3e6b49ce91678cd0917d5349"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbf18d8128a753cb632bef39470d19befd9c7347"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dcc7440f32c7a26b067aff6e7d931ec593024a79"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1ab15a09492a5ae8ab1e2c35ba2cf9e150d25ee"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd2b613bc4c508e55c1221c6595bb889812a4fea"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.