GHSA-M66C-FW79-6359

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-25 18:25 – Updated: 2026-08-25 18:25
VLAI
Summary
eml_parser has parser DoS via deeply nested parentheses in e-mail headers
Details

Summary

eml_parser uses the email.utils.getaddresses() function from the CPython standard library to parse e-mail headers that contain e-mail addresses (such as To, Cc, Bcc, From, Reply-To, Sender, ...). When the input header contains a deeply nested CFWS (comment / folding white space) construct, the recursive descent parser in the standard library exhausts the call stack. The resulting RecursionError is not caught by eml_parser, so the exception propagates and aborts parsing of the whole message.

Impact

SOC pipelines use eml_parser to process untrusted e-mails. An attacker can easily create an eml file that will trigger the RecursionError during parsing.

The impact is mitigated by the fact that there are various other situations in which eml_parser will raise an exception when attempting to parse a malformed or pathological eml file. In particular, very deeply nested multipart e-mails also result in a RecursionError being raised by the library voluntarily. Therefore, systems relying on eml_parser already need to detect and handle errors emanating from the library in an appropriate way.

Workarounds

The issue can be avoided by wrapping the call to eml_parser.decode_email or eml_parser.decode_email_bytes in a try/except construct.

Patches

Since version 3.0.2, eml_parser will catch the error in the standard library parser and fall back to a simpler parser based on a regular expression.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "eml_parser"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.0.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-55619"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-1124",
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-25T18:25:47Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\n`eml_parser` uses the `email.utils.getaddresses()` function from the CPython standard library to parse e-mail headers that contain e-mail addresses (such as `To`, `Cc`, `Bcc`, `From`, `Reply-To`, `Sender`, ...). When the input header contains a deeply nested CFWS (comment / folding white space) construct, the recursive descent parser in the standard library exhausts the call stack. The resulting `RecursionError` is not caught by `eml_parser`, so the exception propagates and aborts parsing of the whole message.\n\n### Impact\n\nSOC pipelines use `eml_parser` to process untrusted e-mails. An attacker can easily create an eml file that will trigger the `RecursionError` during parsing.\n\nThe impact is mitigated by the fact that there are various other situations in which `eml_parser` will raise an exception when attempting to parse a malformed or pathological eml file. In particular, very deeply nested multipart e-mails also result in a `RecursionError` being raised by the library voluntarily. Therefore, systems relying on `eml_parser` already need to detect and handle errors emanating from the library in an appropriate way.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThe issue can be avoided by wrapping the call to `eml_parser.decode_email` or `eml_parser.decode_email_bytes` in a `try/except` construct.\n\n### Patches\n\nSince version 3.0.2, `eml_parser` will catch the error in the standard library parser and fall back to a simpler parser based on a regular expression.",
  "id": "GHSA-m66c-fw79-6359",
  "modified": "2026-08-25T18:25:47Z",
  "published": "2026-08-25T18:25:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser/security/advisories/GHSA-m66c-fw79-6359"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser/pull/90"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser/commit/746a69f86443eb0b6a47f77db3cfe727c21f92b3"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser/releases/tag/v3.0.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "eml_parser has parser DoS via deeply nested parentheses in e-mail headers"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…