ghsa-m649-xm7x-gv2j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:32
Modified
2022-05-01 18:32
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in Server Message Block Version 2 (SMBv2) signing support in Microsoft Windows Vista allows remote attackers to force signature re-computation and execute arbitrary code via a crafted SMBv2 packet, aka "SMBv2 Signing Vulnerability."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-5351" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-94" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2007-12-12T00:46:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Server Message Block Version 2 (SMBv2) signing support in Microsoft Windows Vista allows remote attackers to force signature re-computation and execute arbitrary code via a crafted SMBv2 packet, aka \"SMBv2 Signing Vulnerability.\"", "id": "GHSA-m649-xm7x-gv2j", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:32:21Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:32:21Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5351" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-063" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/38725" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A4208" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/27997" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/520465" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485268/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26777" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-345A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/4179" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.