ghsa-jqwh-9m3g-v933
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-27 21:32
Modified
2025-02-28 18:31
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and earlier and Vigor2133/2762/2832 3.9.9 and earlier and Vigor165/166 4.2.7 and earlier and Vigor2135/2765/2766 4.4.5.1 and earlier and Vigor2865/2866/2927 4.4.5.3 and earlier and Vigor2962/3910 4.3.2.8/4.4.3.1 and earlier and Vigor3912 4.3.6.1 and earlier allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CGI parser's handling of the "Content-Length" header of HTTP POST requests.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-51139" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-120" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T21:15:37Z", "severity": "CRITICAL" }, "details": "Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Vigor2620/LTE200 3.9.8.9 and earlier and Vigor2860/2925 3.9.8 and earlier and Vigor2862/2926 3.9.9.5 and earlier and Vigor2133/2762/2832 3.9.9 and earlier and Vigor165/166 4.2.7 and earlier and Vigor2135/2765/2766 4.4.5.1 and earlier and Vigor2865/2866/2927 4.4.5.3 and earlier and Vigor2962/3910 4.3.2.8/4.4.3.1 and earlier and Vigor3912 4.3.6.1 and earlier allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CGI parser\u0027s handling of the \"Content-Length\" header of HTTP POST requests.", "id": "GHSA-jqwh-9m3g-v933", "modified": "2025-02-28T18:31:01Z", "published": "2025-02-27T21:32:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-51139" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://medium.com/faraday/advisory-multiple-vulnerabilities-affecting-draytek-routers-78a6cb8b3946" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://draytek.com" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…