ghsa-jmvg-2fg9-jhpr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:08
Modified
2022-05-17 05:08
Details
Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in libxml2 2.9.0 and possibly other versions might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) htmlParseChunk and (2) xmldecl_done functions, as demonstrated by a buffer overflow in the xmlBufGetInputBase function.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2013-1969" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2013-04-25T23:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in libxml2 2.9.0 and possibly other versions might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) htmlParseChunk and (2) xmldecl_done functions, as demonstrated by a buffer overflow in the xmlBufGetInputBase function.", "id": "GHSA-jmvg-2fg9-jhpr", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:08:27Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:08:27Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2013-1969" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690202" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.gnome.org/browse/libxml2/commit/?id=de0cc20c29cb3f056062925395e0f68d2250a46f" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-04/msg00109.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00081.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/53061" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/04/17/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/04/19/1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1817-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.