GHSA-JH9H-WFXQ-PFM4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

md/raid1: fix writes_pending and barrier reference leaks on write failures

raid1_make_request() acquires a writes_pending reference with md_write_start() before calling raid1_write_request(). Several failure paths in raid1_write_request() complete the bio and return without reaching the normal write completion path, causing the corresponding md_write_end() to be skipped.

Make raid1_write_request() return a status indicating whether the write request was successfully queued. This allows raid1_make_request() to call md_write_end() when raid1_write_request() fails.

Additionally, if wait_blocked_rdev() fails after wait_barrier() succeeds, the associated barrier reference is not released.

Call allow_barrier() before returning from that path to keep the barrier accounting balanced.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72440"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmd/raid1: fix writes_pending and barrier reference leaks on write failures\n\nraid1_make_request() acquires a writes_pending reference with\nmd_write_start() before calling raid1_write_request(). Several failure\npaths in raid1_write_request() complete the bio and return without\nreaching the normal write completion path, causing the corresponding\nmd_write_end() to be skipped.\n\nMake raid1_write_request() return a status indicating whether the write\nrequest was successfully queued. This allows raid1_make_request() to\ncall md_write_end() when raid1_write_request() fails.\n\nAdditionally, if wait_blocked_rdev() fails after wait_barrier()\nsucceeds, the associated barrier reference is not released.\n\nCall allow_barrier() before returning from that path to keep the barrier\naccounting balanced.",
  "id": "GHSA-jh9h-wfxq-pfm4",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:29Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72440"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e065a1602511282fc0da2dc89445e0eb71a681c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bffbbfcbd9393e315a7a4286dcd70e875265db9a"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…