GHSA-J9JF-6FW4-2V2V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-06 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-08 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname

The calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because it returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a non-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.

Fix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so that the buffer release code is done by each caller of xfs_attr3_leaf_read.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-43153"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-06T12:16:33Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfs: remove xfs_attr_leaf_hasname\n\nThe calling convention of xfs_attr_leaf_hasname() is problematic, because\nit returns a NULL buffer when xfs_attr3_leaf_read fails, a valid buffer\nwhen xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int returns -ENOATTR or -EEXIST, and a\nnon-NULL buffer pointer for an already released buffer when\nxfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int fails with other error values.\n\nFix this by simply open coding xfs_attr_leaf_hasname in the callers, so\nthat the buffer release code is done by each caller of\nxfs_attr3_leaf_read.",
  "id": "GHSA-j9jf-6fw4-2v2v",
  "modified": "2026-05-08T15:31:16Z",
  "published": "2026-05-06T12:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-43153"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fbc8421d1db102c0e5458607e042a23a03648b1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a65ea768b8094e4699e72f9ab420eb9e0f3f568"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/457121c01f609b9934addbb04d5c1ef638c71c61"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/530082df991903f3330354e99e0cb7b05debfa86"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…