GHSA-J49F-WWVQ-PVP4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-04-22 15:31 – Updated: 2026-04-28 00:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: iptfs: validate inner IPv4 header length in IPTFS payload

Add validation of the inner IPv4 packet tot_len and ihl fields parsed from decrypted IPTFS payloads in __input_process_payload(). A crafted ESP packet containing an inner IPv4 header with tot_len=0 causes an infinite loop: iplen=0 leads to capturelen=min(0, remaining)=0, so the data offset never advances and the while(data < tail) loop never terminates, spinning forever in softirq context.

Reject inner IPv4 packets where tot_len < ihl4 or ihl4 < sizeof(struct iphdr), which catches both the tot_len=0 case and malformed ihl values. The normal IP stack performs this validation in ip_rcv_core(), but IPTFS extracts and processes inner packets before they reach that layer.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-31472"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-835"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-22T14:16:43Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxfrm: iptfs: validate inner IPv4 header length in IPTFS payload\n\nAdd validation of the inner IPv4 packet tot_len and ihl fields parsed\nfrom decrypted IPTFS payloads in __input_process_payload(). A crafted\nESP packet containing an inner IPv4 header with tot_len=0 causes an\ninfinite loop: iplen=0 leads to capturelen=min(0, remaining)=0, so the\ndata offset never advances and the while(data \u003c tail) loop never\nterminates, spinning forever in softirq context.\n\nReject inner IPv4 packets where tot_len \u003c ihl*4 or ihl*4 \u003c sizeof(struct\niphdr), which catches both the tot_len=0 case and malformed ihl values.\nThe normal IP stack performs this validation in ip_rcv_core(), but IPTFS\nextracts and processes inner packets before they reach that layer.",
  "id": "GHSA-j49f-wwvq-pvp4",
  "modified": "2026-04-28T00:31:40Z",
  "published": "2026-04-22T15:31:42Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31472"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d10393d5eac33cbd92f7a41fddca12c41d3cb7e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3db7d4f777a00164582061ccaa99569cd85011a3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de6d8e8ce5187f7402c9859b443355e7120c5f09"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…