GHSA-HWQF-5JPW-P78W
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-06 09:31 – Updated: 2026-10-06 09:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mm/shrinker: fix bogus set_shrinker_bit() with cgroup.memory=nokmem
With cgroup.memory=nokmem, shrinker_memcg_alloc() bails out early and never allocates an id, so shrinker->id keeps the 0 it got from the kzalloc() in shrinker_alloc(). __list_lru_init() then copies that 0 into lru->shrinker_id, where it looks like a valid bit index.
Nothing calls expand_shrinker_info() on nokmem either, so shrinker_nr_max stays 0 and every memcg ends up with an empty map (map_nr_max == 0).
deferred_split_folio() hands a real memcg to __list_lru_add() regardless of whether the lru is memcg aware, so the first THP queued in a cgroup does set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, 0) and trips the bounds check:
WARNING: mm/shrinker.c:212 at set_shrinker_bit+0x7d/0x90, CPU#126 Call Trace: deferred_split_folio+0x18c/0x220 map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf+0xdd/0x130 map_anon_folio_pmd_pf+0x14/0xb0 do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x1a1/0x620 __handle_mm_fault+0xea9/0x10d0 handle_mm_fault+0xe5/0x320 do_user_addr_fault+0x1cc/0x870 exc_page_fault+0x81/0x1b0 asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30
Harmless, the WARN_ON_ONCE() is what keeps the out of bounds unit[] read from happening, but the id should not look valid in the first place. Clear it before returning.
Two other spots could paper over this: drop the id in __list_lru_init() when nokmem turns memcg_aware off, or make deferred_split_folio() pass NULL like list_lru_add_obj() does. Both leave shrinker->id lying around for the next caller, so fix it where the id is handed out.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98225"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-06T09:18:09Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm/shrinker: fix bogus set_shrinker_bit() with cgroup.memory=nokmem\n\nWith cgroup.memory=nokmem, shrinker_memcg_alloc() bails out early and\nnever allocates an id, so shrinker-\u003eid keeps the 0 it got from the\nkzalloc() in shrinker_alloc(). __list_lru_init() then copies that 0 into\nlru-\u003eshrinker_id, where it looks like a valid bit index.\n\nNothing calls expand_shrinker_info() on nokmem either, so shrinker_nr_max\nstays 0 and every memcg ends up with an empty map (map_nr_max == 0).\n\ndeferred_split_folio() hands a real memcg to __list_lru_add() regardless\nof whether the lru is memcg aware, so the first THP queued in a cgroup\ndoes set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, 0) and trips the bounds check:\n\nWARNING: mm/shrinker.c:212 at set_shrinker_bit+0x7d/0x90, CPU#126\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n deferred_split_folio+0x18c/0x220\n map_anon_folio_pmd_nopf+0xdd/0x130\n map_anon_folio_pmd_pf+0x14/0xb0\n do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x1a1/0x620\n __handle_mm_fault+0xea9/0x10d0\n handle_mm_fault+0xe5/0x320\n do_user_addr_fault+0x1cc/0x870\n exc_page_fault+0x81/0x1b0\n asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30\n \u003c/TASK\u003e\n\nHarmless, the WARN_ON_ONCE() is what keeps the out of bounds unit[] read\nfrom happening, but the id should not look valid in the first place. \nClear it before returning.\n\nTwo other spots could paper over this: drop the id in __list_lru_init()\nwhen nokmem turns memcg_aware off, or make deferred_split_folio() pass\nNULL like list_lru_add_obj() does. Both leave shrinker-\u003eid lying around\nfor the next caller, so fix it where the id is handed out.",
"id": "GHSA-hwqf-5jpw-p78w",
"modified": "2026-10-06T09:31:31Z",
"published": "2026-10-06T09:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98225"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/469c12a69ab1842a9090b6c074ffedbfd9584f9c"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/932cfb25e7ce98d1f93895671ec186a3087e4f80"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.