ghsa-hphq-v97j-xqw4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:03
Modified
2022-05-13 01:03
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Integer overflow in plug-ins/common/psd.c in the Adobe Photoshop PSD plugin in GIMP 2.2.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted channels header value in a PSD image file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3909.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-3402"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-08-25T10:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Integer overflow in plug-ins/common/psd.c in the Adobe Photoshop PSD plugin in GIMP 2.2.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted channels header value in a PSD image file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow, a different vulnerability than CVE-2009-3909.",
"id": "GHSA-hphq-v97j-xqw4",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:03:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:03:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3402"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012:1181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-3402"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=603059\u0026action=diff"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838941"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1181.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/50737"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201209-23.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/20/6"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027411"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…