GHSA-HP26-G45F-HXP5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-04 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-04 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: Check for invalid/obsolete root after making MMU pages available

Check for a "stale" page fault, i.e. for an invalid and/or obsolete root, after making MMU pages available for the shadow MMU. If reclaiming shadow pages zaps an in-use root, i.e. marks it invalid, then KVM will attempt to map memory into an invalid root. On its own, populating an invalid root is "fine", but because child shadow pages inherit their parent's role, any children created during the map/fetch will be created as invalid pages, thus violating KVM's invariant that invalid pages are never on the list of active MMU pages.

Note, the underlying flaw has existed since KVM first started tracking invalid roots in 2008 (commit 2e53d63acba7, "KVM: MMU: ignore zapped root pagetables"), but the true badness only came along in 2020 (Linux 5.9) with the invariant that invalid shadow pages can't be on the list of active pages.

Note #2, inheriting role.invalid when creating child shadow pages is also far from ideal; that flaw will be addressed separately.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64561"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-04T07:16:30Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86: Check for invalid/obsolete root *after* making MMU pages available\n\nCheck for a \"stale\" page fault, i.e. for an invalid and/or obsolete root,\nafter making MMU pages available for the shadow MMU.  If reclaiming shadow\npages zaps an in-use root, i.e. marks it invalid, then KVM will attempt to\nmap memory into an invalid root.  On its own, populating an invalid root is\n\"fine\", but because child shadow pages inherit their parent\u0027s role, any\nchildren created during the map/fetch will be created as invalid pages,\nthus violating KVM\u0027s invariant that invalid pages are never on the list of\nactive MMU pages.\n\nNote, the underlying flaw has existed since KVM first started tracking\ninvalid roots in 2008 (commit 2e53d63acba7, \"KVM: MMU: ignore zapped root\npagetables\"), but the true badness only came along in 2020 (Linux 5.9)\nwith the invariant that invalid shadow pages can\u0027t be on the list of\nactive pages.\n\nNote #2, inheriting role.invalid when creating child shadow pages is also\nfar from ideal; that flaw will be addressed separately.",
  "id": "GHSA-hp26-g45f-hxp5",
  "modified": "2026-08-04T09:31:35Z",
  "published": "2026-08-04T09:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64561"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0026dbb7de8ea76e97d6edf42fc3cc084564e2bf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2abd5287f08319fa35764566b15c6e22cb1068db"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35e77467610c4a37cb0ff54ee56b85f73b1f5700"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bce0d3c26e2c761a4bf43c8949f333fc7374eb2d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3477a6a4164f15287444eda685b5f6405dbd1e5"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…