GHSA-HP23-354F-RH79
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:30 – Updated: 2024-03-21 03:32
VLAI
Details
** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in init.php in Jens Tkotz myIpacNG-stats (MINGS) 0.05 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the MINGS_BASE parameter. NOTE: this issue is disputed by CVE because MINGS_BASE is defined before use.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5165"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-10-01T05:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in init.php in Jens Tkotz myIpacNG-stats (MINGS) 0.05 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the MINGS_BASE parameter. NOTE: this issue is disputed by CVE because MINGS_BASE is defined before use.",
"id": "GHSA-hp23-354f-rh79",
"modified": "2024-03-21T03:32:58Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:30:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5165"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://arfis.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/rfi-02-myipacng-stats"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/41058"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…