ghsa-gxg7-pxwf-9r28
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-10-04 21:30
Modified
2024-08-21 18:31
Severity ?
Details
An improper input validation flaw was found in the eBPF subsystem in the Linux kernel. The issue occurs due to a lack of proper validation of dynamic pointers within user-supplied eBPF programs prior to executing them. This may allow an attacker with CAP_BPF privileges to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of the kernel.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-39191" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-20" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-04T19:15:10Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "An improper input validation flaw was found in the eBPF subsystem in the Linux kernel. The issue occurs due to a lack of proper validation of dynamic pointers within user-supplied eBPF programs prior to executing them. This may allow an attacker with CAP_BPF privileges to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of the kernel.", "id": "GHSA-gxg7-pxwf-9r28", "modified": "2024-08-21T18:31:25Z", "published": "2023-10-04T21:30:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39191" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:6583" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0381" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0439" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0448" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-39191" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226783" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-CAN-19399" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.