GHSA-GRGP-HRRX-JXVP
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 03:00 – Updated: 2022-04-29 03:00
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in ibserver for Firebird Database 1.0 and other versions before 1.5, and possibly other products that use the InterBase codebase, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long database name, as demonstrated using the gsec command.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-2043"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2004-05-01T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in ibserver for Firebird Database 1.0 and other versions before 1.5, and possibly other products that use the InterBase codebase, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long database name, as demonstrated using the gsec command.",
"id": "GHSA-grgp-hrrx-jxvp",
"modified": "2022-04-29T03:00:41Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T03:00:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2043"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16229"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16316"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2004-06/0027.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=108611386202493\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/11756"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/19350"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1010381"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1014"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/6408"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/6624"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securiteam.com/unixfocus/5AP0P0UCUO.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10446"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…