ghsa-ghg3-c9m4-3hc2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-11-07 21:31
Modified
2025-11-07 21:31
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The chat feature in the application Sourcecodester FAQ Bot with AI Assistant v1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) due to improper handling of user-supplied input. An attacker can inject malicious HTML or JavaScript into chat messages, which executes in the browser of any user viewing the conversation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-63639"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-07T20:15:38Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "The chat feature in the application Sourcecodester FAQ Bot with AI Assistant v1.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) due to improper handling of user-supplied input. An attacker can inject malicious HTML or JavaScript into chat messages, which executes in the browser of any user viewing the conversation.",
"id": "GHSA-ghg3-c9m4-3hc2",
"modified": "2025-11-07T21:31:21Z",
"published": "2025-11-07T21:31:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-63639"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/ChuckBartowski7/Vulnerability-Research/blob/main/CVE-2025-63639/README.md"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.sourcecodester.com/javascript/18413/faq-bot-ai-assistant-using-html-css-and-javascript-source-code.html"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…