GHSA-FP8W-CCF9-RFR2
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:35 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:35
VLAI
Details
The safe_path function in shttp before 0.0.5 allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read files via a combination of ".." and sub-directory specifiers that resolve to a pathname that is at or below the same level as the web document root, but in a different part of the directory tree.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-5685"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-10-28T17:08:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The safe_path function in shttp before 0.0.5 allows remote attackers to conduct directory traversal attacks and read files via a combination of \"..\" and sub-directory specifiers that resolve to a pathname that is at or below the same level as the web document root, but in a different part of the directory tree.",
"id": "GHSA-fp8w-ccf9-rfr2",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:35:44Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:35:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-5685"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/37455"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/43607"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://serverkit.org/modules/contrib/shttp/shttp-0.0.5.tar.gz"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.digineo.co.uk/shttp_directory_traversal"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/482797/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/26212"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…