ghsa-fj92-mxc6-v4w3
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:57
Modified
2025-04-20 03:32
Severity ?
Details
An incorrect implementation of "XEP-0280: Message Carbons" in multiple XMPP clients allows a remote attacker to impersonate any user, including contacts, in the vulnerable application's display. This allows for various kinds of social engineering attacks. This CVE is for Psi+ (0.16.563.580 - 0.16.571.627).
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-5593", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-20", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-02-09T20:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "An incorrect implementation of \"XEP-0280: Message Carbons\" in multiple XMPP clients allows a remote attacker to impersonate any user, including contacts, in the vulnerable application's display. This allows for various kinds of social engineering attacks. This CVE is for Psi+ (0.16.563.580 - 0.16.571.627).", id: "GHSA-fj92-mxc6-v4w3", modified: "2025-04-20T03:32:39Z", published: "2022-05-17T02:57:31Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5593", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/psi-im/iris/pull/47/commits/02e976d4426a1319a7af7d26d7aba9d8c6077570", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://rt-solutions.de/en/2017/02/CVE-2017-5589_xmpp_carbons", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://rt-solutions.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CVE-2017-5589_xmpp_carbons.pdf", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/09/29", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96169", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.