ghsa-fgfv-9xqc-v794
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-19 00:31
Modified
2025-03-21 18:31
Severity ?
Details
libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur for an untrusted document or untrusted DTD. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2017-9047.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2025-24928", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-121", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2025-02-18T23:15:10Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur for an untrusted document or untrusted DTD. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2017-9047.", id: "GHSA-fgfv-9xqc-v794", modified: "2025-03-21T18:31:29Z", published: "2025-02-19T00:31:19Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24928", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/847", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/392687022", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250321-0006", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.