GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-CX83-HXFR-M85V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xsk: cache csum_start/csum_offset to fix TOCTOU in xsk_skb_metadata()

The TX metadata area resides in the UMEM buffer which is memory-mapped and concurrently writable by userspace. In xsk_skb_metadata(), csum_start and csum_offset are read from shared memory for bounds validation, then read again for skb assignment. A malicious userspace application can race to overwrite these values between the two reads, bypassing the bounds check and causing out-of-bounds memory access during checksum computation in the transmit path.

Fix this by reading csum_start and csum_offset into local variables once, then using the local copies for both validation and assignment.

Note that other metadata fields (flags, launch_time) and the cached csum fields may be mutually inconsistent due to concurrent userspace writes, but this is benign: the only security-critical invariant is that each field's validated value is the same one used, which local caching guarantees.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53250"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-367"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:42Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nxsk: cache csum_start/csum_offset to fix TOCTOU in xsk_skb_metadata()\n\nThe TX metadata area resides in the UMEM buffer which is memory-mapped\nand concurrently writable by userspace. In xsk_skb_metadata(),\ncsum_start and csum_offset are read from shared memory for bounds\nvalidation, then read again for skb assignment. A malicious userspace\napplication can race to overwrite these values between the two reads,\nbypassing the bounds check and causing out-of-bounds memory access\nduring checksum computation in the transmit path.\n\nFix this by reading csum_start and csum_offset into local variables\nonce, then using the local copies for both validation and assignment.\n\nNote that other metadata fields (flags, launch_time) and the cached\ncsum fields may be mutually inconsistent due to concurrent userspace\nwrites, but this is benign: the only security-critical invariant is\nthat each field\u0027s validated value is the same one used, which local\ncaching guarantees.",
  "id": "GHSA-cx83-hxfr-m85v",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T12:31:30Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0dfe05b938435892875e07771170051346412df9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22ba97ea9cc1f63a0d0244fae38057ed452b6ac7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfdfd2706d5fb2cd496a1506e680daf979309c8b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb778aed8a9b2381668fcb1247ae4fa011224768"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…