ghsa-cr4c-368c-2fc2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 02:37
Modified
2022-05-17 02:37
Details

Xen 4.7.x and earlier does not properly honor CR0.TS and CR0.EM, which allows local x86 HVM guest OS users to read or modify FPU, MMX, or XMM register state information belonging to arbitrary tasks on the guest by modifying an instruction while the hypervisor is preparing to emulate it.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2016-7777"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2016-10-07T14:59:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Xen 4.7.x and earlier does not properly honor CR0.TS and CR0.EM, which allows local x86 HVM guest OS users to read or modify FPU, MMX, or XMM register state information belonging to arbitrary tasks on the guest by modifying an instruction while the hypervisor is preparing to emulate it.",
  "id": "GHSA-cr4c-368c-2fc2",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T02:37:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T02:37:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-7777"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201611-09"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX217363"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93344"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036942"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-190.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.