GHSA-CQF6-WPGM-M6GF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 03:01 – Updated: 2022-04-29 03:01
VLAI
Details

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Layton HelpBox 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the sys_comment_id parameter in editcommentenduser.asp, (2) the sys_suspend_id parameter in editsuspensionuser.asp, (3) the table parameter in export_data.asp, (4) the sys_analgroup parameter in manageanalgrouppreference.asp, (5) the sys_asset_id parameter in quickinfoassetrequests.asp, (6) the sys_eusername parameter in quickinfoenduserrequests.asp, and the sys_request_id parameter in (7) requestauditlog.asp, (8) requestcommentsenduser.asp, (9) selectrequestapplytemplate.asp, and (10) selectrequestlink.asp, resulting in an ability to create a new HelpBox user account and read, modify, or delete data from the backend database.

Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-2551"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-31T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Layton HelpBox 3.0.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via (1) the sys_comment_id parameter in editcommentenduser.asp, (2) the sys_suspend_id parameter in editsuspensionuser.asp, (3) the table parameter in export_data.asp, (4) the sys_analgroup parameter in manageanalgrouppreference.asp, (5) the sys_asset_id parameter in quickinfoassetrequests.asp, (6) the sys_eusername parameter in quickinfoenduserrequests.asp, and the sys_request_id parameter in (7) requestauditlog.asp, (8) requestcommentsenduser.asp, (9) selectrequestapplytemplate.asp, and (10) selectrequestlink.asp, resulting in an ability to create a new HelpBox user account and read, modify, or delete data from the backend database.",
  "id": "GHSA-cqf6-wpgm-m6gf",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T03:01:40Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T03:01:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-2551"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16772"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16774"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/12118"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8170"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8171"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8172"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8173"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8174"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8175"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8176"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8178"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/8179"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securiteam.com/windowsntfocus/5VP0S0ADFW.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10776"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.