Vulnerability-Lookup

GHSA-CJMC-HC9F-GVG8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:22 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:22

Details

The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents no authentication mechanism on its version 1.0 (nor authorization) whichs leads to a variety of attacks including identity spoofing, unauthorized access, PITM attacks and more. According to literature, version 2.0 optionally allows for package signing which mitigates this flaw. Another source mentions that MAVLink 2.0 only provides a simple authentication system based on HMAC. This implies that the flying system overall should add the same symmetric key into all devices of network. If not the case, this may cause a security issue, that if one of the devices and its symmetric key are compromised, the whole authentication system is not reliable.

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-10282"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-306"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2020-07-03T15:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents no authentication mechanism on its version 1.0 (nor authorization) whichs leads to a variety of attacks including identity spoofing, unauthorized access, PITM attacks and more. According to literature, version 2.0 optionally allows for package signing which mitigates this flaw. Another source mentions that MAVLink 2.0 only provides a simple authentication system based on HMAC. This implies that the flying system overall should add the same symmetric key into all devices of network. If not the case, this may cause a security issue, that if one of the devices and its symmetric key are compromised, the whole authentication system is not reliable.",
  "id": "GHSA-cjmc-hc9f-gvg8",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T17:22:22Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T17:22:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10282"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

CVE-2020-10282 (GCVE-0-2020-10282)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-07-03 14:30 – Updated: 2024-09-16 17:22

Title

RVD#3316: No authentication in MAVLink protocol

Summary

Severity

9.8 (Critical)


                        
                          CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

CWE

CWE-306

Assigner

Alias INCIBE root

References

1 reference

URL	Tags
https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4	x_refsource_CONFIRM

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
unspecified	MAVLink	Affected: v1.0

Date Public

2020-07-03 00:00

Credits

None

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T10:58:39.958Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "MAVLink",
          "vendor": "unspecified",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "v1.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "None"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2020-07-03T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents no authentication mechanism on its version 1.0 (nor authorization) whichs leads to a variety of attacks including identity spoofing, unauthorized access, PITM attacks and more. According to literature, version 2.0 optionally allows for package signing which mitigates this flaw. Another source mentions that MAVLink 2.0 only provides a simple authentication system based on HMAC. This implies that the flying system overall should add the same symmetric key into all devices of network. If not the case, this may cause a security issue, that if one of the devices and its symmetric key are compromised, the whole authentication system is not reliable."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-306",
              "description": "CWE-306",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-07-03T14:30:15.000Z",
        "orgId": "dc524f69-879d-41dc-ab8f-724e78658a1a",
        "shortName": "Alias"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "defect": [
          "RVD#3316"
        ],
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "RVD#3316: No authentication in MAVLink protocol",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Robot Vulnerability Database (RVD)"
      },
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@aliasrobotics.com",
          "DATE_PUBLIC": "2020-07-03T14:21:35 +00:00",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-10282",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC",
          "TITLE": "RVD#3316: No authentication in MAVLink protocol"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "MAVLink",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "v1.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": ""
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "credit": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "None"
          }
        ],
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "The Micro Air Vehicle Link (MAVLink) protocol presents no authentication mechanism on its version 1.0 (nor authorization) whichs leads to a variety of attacks including identity spoofing, unauthorized access, PITM attacks and more. According to literature, version 2.0 optionally allows for package signing which mitigates this flaw. Another source mentions that MAVLink 2.0 only provides a simple authentication system based on HMAC. This implies that the flying system overall should add the same symmetric key into all devices of network. If not the case, this may cause a security issue, that if one of the devices and its symmetric key are compromised, the whole authentication system is not reliable."
            }
          ]
        },
        "generator": {
          "engine": "Robot Vulnerability Database (RVD)"
        },
        "impact": {
          "cvss": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 9.8,
            "baseSeverity": "critical",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-306"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://github.com/rligocki/Diploma_thesis_px4"
            }
          ]
        },
        "source": {
          "defect": [
            "RVD#3316"
          ],
          "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "dc524f69-879d-41dc-ab8f-724e78658a1a",
    "assignerShortName": "Alias",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-10282",
    "datePublished": "2020-07-03T14:30:15.587Z",
    "dateReserved": "2020-03-10T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T17:22:38.711Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.

Action not permitted

GHSA-CJMC-HC9F-GVG8

CVE-2020-10282 (GCVE-0-2020-10282)

Tags

Sightings

Nomenclature

Related by attack behaviour