ghsa-c7hp-2r8c-mmw4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:06
Modified
2022-05-14 02:06
Details
The Off Main Thread Compositing (OMTC) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 37.0 makes an incorrect memset call during interaction with the mozilla::layers::BufferTextureClient::AllocateForSurface function, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via vectors that trigger rendering of 2D graphics content.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-0805" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-04-01T10:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "The Off Main Thread Compositing (OMTC) implementation in Mozilla Firefox before 37.0 makes an incorrect memset call during interaction with the mozilla::layers::BufferTextureClient::AllocateForSurface function, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via vectors that trigger rendering of 2D graphics content.", "id": "GHSA-c7hp-2r8c-mmw4", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:06:22Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:06:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0805" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1135511" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201512-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00003.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2015/mfsa2015-38.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinapr2016-2952098.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031996" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2550-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.