GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-C2FV-2FMJ-9XRX

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-28 06:30 – Updated: 2026-05-05 20:25
Withdrawn 2026-05-05 VLAI
Summary
Duplicate Advisory: ssrfcheck has Incomplete IP Address Deny List that leads to Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability
Details

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-p4hc-9pjh-55c8. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

Versions of the package ssrfcheck below 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "ssrfcheck"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-07-28T16:42:51Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-28T05:16:20Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-p4hc-9pjh-55c8. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n### Original Description\nVersions of the package ssrfcheck below 1.2.0 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to an incomplete denylist of IP address ranges. Specifically, the package fails to classify the reserved IP address space 224.0.0.0/4 (Multicast) as invalid. This oversight allows attackers to craft requests targeting these multicast addresses.",
  "id": "GHSA-c2fv-2fmj-9xrx",
  "modified": "2026-05-05T20:25:33Z",
  "published": "2025-07-28T06:30:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-8267"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/issues/5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck/commit/9507b49fd764f2a1a1d1e3b9ee577b7545e6950e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/lirantal/2976840639df824cb3abe60d13c65e04"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/felippe-regazio/ssrfcheck"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-SSRFCHECK-9510756"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Duplicate Advisory: ssrfcheck has Incomplete IP Address Deny List that leads to Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability",
  "withdrawn": "2026-05-05T20:25:33Z"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…