GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9X65-M9RH-PQXF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-04-02 09:30 – Updated: 2025-02-03 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting

When I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression, there is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.

$ cat test.sh prog=bcachefs

$prog subvolume create /mnt/data $prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots

while true;do $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s) sleep 1s done

$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf systemLog: destination: file logAppend: true path: /mnt/data/mongod.log

storage: dbPath: /mnt/data/

lockdep reports: [ 3437.452330] ====================================================== [ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G E [ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.454875] but task is already holding lock: [ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.456009] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 3437.456553] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3437.457054] -> #3 (&type->s_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}: [ 3437.457507] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.457772] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.458206] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.458498] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.458779] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.459155] -> #2 (&c->snapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3437.459615] down_read+0x3e/0x170 [ 3437.459878] bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460276] bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.460686] notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0 [ 3437.461283] do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0 [ 3437.461555] path_openat+0xa57/0xce0 [ 3437.461836] do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160 [ 3437.462116] do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0 [ 3437.462402] __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0 [ 3437.462701] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.462982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.463359] -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3437.463843] down_write+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3437.464223] bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs] [ 3437.464493] vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0 [ 3437.464653] ksys_write+0x69/0xf0 [ 3437.464839] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.465009] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.465231] -> #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3437.465471] __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0 [ 3437.465656] lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0 [ 3437.465822] mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0 [ 3437.465996] filename_create+0x62/0x190 [ 3437.466175] user_path_create+0x2d/0x50 [ 3437.466352] bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs] [ 3437.466617] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0 [ 3437.466791] do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0 [ 3437.466957] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 [ 3437.467180] other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533: other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of: sb_writers#10 --> &c->snapshot_create_lock --> &type->s_umount_key#48

[ 3437.467979] Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 3437.468223] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3437.468405] ---- ---- [ 3437.468585] rlock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.468758] lock(&c->snapshot_create_lock); [ 3437.469030] lock(&type->s_umount_key#48); [ 3437.469291] rlock(sb_writers#10); [ 3437.469434] *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 3437.469 ---truncated---

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-26658"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-667"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-04-02T07:15:42Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbcachefs: grab s_umount only if snapshotting\n\nWhen I was testing mongodb over bcachefs with compression,\nthere is a lockdep warning when snapshotting mongodb data volume.\n\n$ cat test.sh\nprog=bcachefs\n\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data\n$prog subvolume create /mnt/data/snapshots\n\nwhile true;do\n    $prog subvolume snapshot /mnt/data /mnt/data/snapshots/$(date +%s)\n    sleep 1s\ndone\n\n$ cat /etc/mongodb.conf\nsystemLog:\n  destination: file\n  logAppend: true\n  path: /mnt/data/mongod.log\n\nstorage:\n  dbPath: /mnt/data/\n\nlockdep reports:\n[ 3437.452330] ======================================================\n[ 3437.452750] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected\n[ 3437.453168] 6.7.0-rc7-custom+ #85 Tainted: G            E\n[ 3437.453562] ------------------------------------------------------\n[ 3437.453981] bcachefs/35533 is trying to acquire lock:\n[ 3437.454325] ffffa0a02b2b1418 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.454875]\n               but task is already holding lock:\n[ 3437.455268] ffffa0a02b2b10e0 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.456009]\n               which lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n[ 3437.456553]\n               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n[ 3437.457054]\n               -\u003e #3 (\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48){.+.+}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.457507]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.457772]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x232/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.458206]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.458498]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.458779]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.459155]\n               -\u003e #2 (\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock){++++}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.459615]        down_read+0x3e/0x170\n[ 3437.459878]        bch2_truncate+0x82/0x110 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460276]        bchfs_truncate+0x254/0x3c0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.460686]        notify_change+0x1f1/0x4a0\n[ 3437.461283]        do_truncate+0x7f/0xd0\n[ 3437.461555]        path_openat+0xa57/0xce0\n[ 3437.461836]        do_filp_open+0xb4/0x160\n[ 3437.462116]        do_sys_openat2+0x91/0xc0\n[ 3437.462402]        __x64_sys_openat+0x53/0xa0\n[ 3437.462701]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.462982]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.463359]\n               -\u003e #1 (\u0026sb-\u003es_type-\u003ei_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}:\n[ 3437.463843]        down_write+0x3b/0xc0\n[ 3437.464223]        bch2_write_iter+0x5b/0xcc0 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.464493]        vfs_write+0x21b/0x4c0\n[ 3437.464653]        ksys_write+0x69/0xf0\n[ 3437.464839]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.465009]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.465231]\n               -\u003e #0 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}:\n[ 3437.465471]        __lock_acquire+0x1455/0x21b0\n[ 3437.465656]        lock_acquire+0xc6/0x2b0\n[ 3437.465822]        mnt_want_write+0x46/0x1a0\n[ 3437.465996]        filename_create+0x62/0x190\n[ 3437.466175]        user_path_create+0x2d/0x50\n[ 3437.466352]        bch2_fs_file_ioctl+0x2ec/0xc90 [bcachefs]\n[ 3437.466617]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x93/0xd0\n[ 3437.466791]        do_syscall_64+0x42/0xf0\n[ 3437.466957]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76\n[ 3437.467180]\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.469670] 2 locks held by bcachefs/35533:\n               other info that might help us debug this:\n\n[ 3437.467507] Chain exists of:\n                 sb_writers#10 --\u003e \u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock --\u003e \u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48\n\n[ 3437.467979]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n[ 3437.468223]        CPU0                    CPU1\n[ 3437.468405]        ----                    ----\n[ 3437.468585]   rlock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.468758]                                lock(\u0026c-\u003esnapshot_create_lock);\n[ 3437.469030]                                lock(\u0026type-\u003es_umount_key#48);\n[ 3437.469291]   rlock(sb_writers#10);\n[ 3437.469434]\n                *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n[ 3437.469\n---truncated---",
  "id": "GHSA-9x65-m9rh-pqxf",
  "modified": "2025-02-03T18:30:35Z",
  "published": "2024-04-02T09:30:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-26658"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2acc59dd88d27ad69b66ded80df16c042b04eeec"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b41d3fd04c6757b9c2a60a0c5b2609cae9999df"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…