GHSA-9RCF-CW39-WCMJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:52 – Updated: 2022-05-14 02:52Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in FOG 0.27 through 0.32 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Printer Model field to the Printer Management page, (2) Image Name field to the Image Management page, (3) Storage Group Name field to the Storage Management page, (4) Username field to the User Cleanup FOG Configuration page, or (5) Directory Path field to the Directory Cleaner FOG Configuration page.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-3111"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-79"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-21T16:55:00Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in FOG 0.27 through 0.32 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Printer Model field to the Printer Management page, (2) Image Name field to the Image Management page, (3) Storage Group Name field to the Storage Management page, (4) Username field to the User Cleanup FOG Configuration page, or (5) Directory Path field to the Directory Cleaner FOG Configuration page.",
"id": "GHSA-9rcf-cw39-wcmj",
"modified": "2022-05-14T02:52:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:52:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3111"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://fogproject.org/forum/threads/stored-xss-vulnerability-in-fog-project-version-0-27-through-0-32.10394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/May/60"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/04/30/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/532091/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67141"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.