ghsa-9q5f-38fg-f2p5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 18:44
Modified
2022-05-01 18:44
Details
Interpretation conflict in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a User-Agent header line that contains a carriage-return character, which is considered a line delimiter when the header is split into individual lines, but not when log_user_agent in RTSP_utils.c parses the content of the User-Agent line.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2007-6629" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-01-04T00:46:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Interpretation conflict in LScube Feng 0.1.15 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL dereference and daemon crash) via a User-Agent header line that contains a carriage-return character, which is considered a line delimiter when the header is split into individual lines, but not when log_user_agent in RTSP_utils.c parses the content of the User-Agent line.", "id": "GHSA-9q5f-38fg-f2p5", "modified": "2022-05-01T18:44:55Z", "published": "2022-05-01T18:44:55Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-6629" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://aluigi.altervista.org/adv/fengulo-adv.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://aluigi.org/poc/fengulo.zip" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/40537" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/28229" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3507" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/485574/100/0/threaded" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/27049" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0011" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.