ghsa-9gvm-vcgf-x5xw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-06 21:30
Modified
2024-07-22 18:31
Details
nscd: Stack-based buffer overflow in netgroup cache
If the Name Service Cache Daemon's (nscd) fixed size cache is exhausted by client requests then a subsequent client request for netgroup data may result in a stack-based buffer overflow. This flaw was introduced in glibc 2.15 when the cache was added to nscd.
This vulnerability is only present in the nscd binary.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-33599" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-121" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-05-06T20:15:11Z", "severity": null }, "details": "nscd: Stack-based buffer overflow in netgroup cache\n\nIf the Name Service Cache Daemon\u0027s (nscd) fixed size cache is exhausted\nby client requests then a subsequent client request for netgroup data\nmay result in a stack-based buffer overflow. This flaw was introduced\nin glibc 2.15 when the cache was added to nscd.\n\nThis vulnerability is only present in the nscd binary.\n", "id": "GHSA-9gvm-vcgf-x5xw", "modified": "2024-07-22T18:31:47Z", "published": "2024-05-06T21:30:38Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-33599" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/06/msg00026.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240524-0011" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=advisories/GLIBC-SA-2024-0005" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/22/5" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.