GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-96FH-M4R8-6V9V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-05 16:04 – Updated: 2026-07-20 21:18
VLAI
Summary
NocoDB: Cross-Workspace Integration Use in Connection Test
Details

Summary

A user in one workspace could exercise another workspace's integration through the testConnection endpoint by supplying its ID, because the integration was fetched in a bypass scope and the caller's permission check matched any base in any workspace.

Details

The connection-test endpoint fetched the integration in RootScopes.BYPASS scope and checked only that the integration was non-private and that the caller held an owner/creator role on any base in any workspace. The permission lookup is now scoped to the integration's workspace by joining on fk_workspace_id, and the controller rejects requests where the integration's workspace differs from the request's workspace.

Impact

Cross-tenant access to integration configuration through the connection-test endpoint, including the ability to drive the resolved database with the other workspace's credentials. Authentication with creator-or-owner role on any base in any workspace was sufficient.

Credit

This issue was reported by @DongyangLyu.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 2026.05.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "nocodb"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "2026.05.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-47381"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-290"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-05T16:04:32Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-23T21:16:59Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nA user in one workspace could exercise another workspace\u0027s integration through the\n`testConnection` endpoint by supplying its ID, because the integration was fetched in\na bypass scope and the caller\u0027s permission check matched any base in any workspace.\n\n### Details\nThe connection-test endpoint fetched the integration in `RootScopes.BYPASS` scope and\nchecked only that the integration was non-private and that the caller held an\nowner/creator role on any base in any workspace. The permission lookup is now scoped\nto the integration\u0027s workspace by joining on `fk_workspace_id`, and the controller\nrejects requests where the integration\u0027s workspace differs from the request\u0027s workspace.\n\n### Impact\nCross-tenant access to integration configuration through the connection-test endpoint,\nincluding the ability to drive the resolved database with the other workspace\u0027s\ncredentials. Authentication with creator-or-owner role on any base in any workspace\nwas sufficient.\n\n### Credit\nThis issue was reported by [@DongyangLyu](https://github.com/DongyangLyu).",
  "id": "GHSA-96fh-m4r8-6v9v",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T21:18:13Z",
  "published": "2026-06-05T16:04:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/security/advisories/GHSA-96fh-m4r8-6v9v"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47381"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/releases/tag/2026.05.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "NocoDB: Cross-Workspace Integration Use in Connection Test"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…