ghsa-8p24-3ggp-6hcw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:43
Modified
2025-04-20 03:46
Severity ?
Details
In Wireshark 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and 2.2.0 to 2.2.9, the BT ATT dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-btatt.c by considering a case where not all of the BTATT packets have the same encapsulation level.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-15192", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-10-10T21:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In Wireshark 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and 2.2.0 to 2.2.9, the BT ATT dissector could crash. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-btatt.c by considering a case where not all of the BTATT packets have the same encapsulation level.", id: "GHSA-8p24-3ggp-6hcw", modified: "2025-04-20T03:46:32Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:43:39Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15192", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14049", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/23470", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3689dc1db36037436b1616715f9a3f888fc9a0f6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=3689dc1db36037436b1616715f9a3f888fc9a0f6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2017-42.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101235", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.