ghsa-8h6v-vg4c-567j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:10
Modified
2025-04-03 04:16
VLAI Severity ?
Details
Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2640"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-08-23T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Behavioral discrepancy information leak in Juniper Netscreen VPN running ScreenOS 5.2.0 and earlier, when using IKE with pre-shared key authentication, allows remote attackers to enumerate valid usernames via an IKE Aggressive Mode packet, which generates a response if the username is valid but does not respond when the username is invalid.",
"id": "GHSA-8h6v-vg4c-567j",
"modified": "2025-04-03T04:16:39Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:10:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2640"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=112438068426034\u0026w=2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16474"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1014728"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.nta-monitor.com/news/vpn-flaws/juniper/netscreen/index.htm"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14595"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…