ghsa-8fjr-rrxr-cpv2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 03:58
Modified
2022-05-14 03:58
Severity ?
Details
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the NFS client in the Linux kernel before 4.2.2 does not properly initialize memory for migration recovery operations, which allows remote NFS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and panic) via crafted network traffic.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-8746" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2016-05-02T10:59:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the NFS client in the Linux kernel before 4.2.2 does not properly initialize memory for migration recovery operations, which allows remote NFS servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and panic) via crafted network traffic.", "id": "GHSA-8fjr-rrxr-cpv2", "modified": "2022-05-14T03:58:22Z", "published": "2022-05-14T03:58:22Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-8746" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/18e3b739fdc826481c6a1335ce0c5b19b3d415da" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295802" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=18e3b739fdc826481c6a1335ce0c5b19b3d415da" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2574.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2584.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.2.2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/05/9" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034594" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.