ghsa-89ff-5r66-wr8j
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:11
Modified
2022-05-13 01:11
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through 3.7.3. CRLF injection is possible if the attacker controls a url parameter, as demonstrated by the first argument to urllib.request.urlopen with \r\n (specifically in the path component of a URL that lacks a ? character) followed by an HTTP header or a Redis command. This is similar to the CVE-2019-9740 query string issue. This is fixed in: v2.7.17, v2.7.17rc1, v2.7.18, v2.7.18rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-9947"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-93"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-03-23T18:29:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "An issue was discovered in urllib2 in Python 2.x through 2.7.16 and urllib in Python 3.x through 3.7.3. CRLF injection is possible if the attacker controls a url parameter, as demonstrated by the first argument to urllib.request.urlopen with \\r\\n (specifically in the path component of a URL that lacks a ? character) followed by an HTTP header or a Redis command. This is similar to the CVE-2019-9740 query string issue. This is fixed in: v2.7.17, v2.7.17rc1, v2.7.18, v2.7.18rc1; v3.5.10, v3.5.10rc1, v3.5.8, v3.5.8rc1, v3.5.8rc2, v3.5.9; v3.6.10, v3.6.10rc1, v3.6.11, v3.6.11rc1, v3.6.12, v3.6.9, v3.6.9rc1; v3.7.4, v3.7.4rc1, v3.7.4rc2, v3.7.5, v3.7.5rc1, v3.7.6, v3.7.6rc1, v3.7.7, v3.7.7rc1, v3.7.8, v3.7.8rc1, v3.7.9.",
"id": "GHSA-89ff-5r66-wr8j",
"modified": "2022-05-13T01:11:47Z",
"published": "2022-05-13T01:11:47Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9947"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4127-2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4127-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0004"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JXASHCDD4PQFKTMKQN4YOP5ZH366ABN4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JMWSKTNOHSUOT3L25QFJAVCFYZX46FYK"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00034.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/07/msg00011.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/06/msg00026.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/06/msg00023.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/06/msg00022.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugs.python.org/issue35906"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3725"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3520"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1260"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00062.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00063.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/04/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…