GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-887M-4QRH-HJQ5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-25 12:30 – Updated: 2026-04-02 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf, arm64: Force 8-byte alignment for JIT buffer to prevent atomic tearing

struct bpf_plt contains a u64 target field. Currently, the BPF JIT allocator requests an alignment of 4 bytes (sizeof(u32)) for the JIT buffer.

Because the base address of the JIT buffer can be 4-byte aligned (e.g., ending in 0x4 or 0xc), the relative padding logic in build_plt() fails to ensure that target lands on an 8-byte boundary.

This leads to two issues: 1. UBSAN reports misaligned-access warnings when dereferencing the structure. 2. More critically, target is updated concurrently via WRITE_ONCE() in bpf_arch_text_poke() while the JIT'd code executes ldr. On arm64, 64-bit loads/stores are only guaranteed to be single-copy atomic if they are 64-bit aligned. A misaligned target risks a torn read, causing the JIT to jump to a corrupted address.

Fix this by increasing the allocation alignment requirement to 8 bytes (sizeof(u64)) in bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(). This anchors the base of the JIT buffer to an 8-byte boundary, allowing the relative padding math in build_plt() to correctly align the target field.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23383"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-03-25T11:16:38Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf, arm64: Force 8-byte alignment for JIT buffer to prevent atomic tearing\n\nstruct bpf_plt contains a u64 target field. Currently, the BPF JIT\nallocator requests an alignment of 4 bytes (sizeof(u32)) for the JIT\nbuffer.\n\nBecause the base address of the JIT buffer can be 4-byte aligned (e.g.,\nending in 0x4 or 0xc), the relative padding logic in build_plt() fails\nto ensure that target lands on an 8-byte boundary.\n\nThis leads to two issues:\n1. UBSAN reports misaligned-access warnings when dereferencing the\n   structure.\n2. More critically, target is updated concurrently via WRITE_ONCE() in\n   bpf_arch_text_poke() while the JIT\u0027d code executes ldr. On arm64,\n   64-bit loads/stores are only guaranteed to be single-copy atomic if\n   they are 64-bit aligned. A misaligned target risks a torn read,\n   causing the JIT to jump to a corrupted address.\n\nFix this by increasing the allocation alignment requirement to 8 bytes\n(sizeof(u64)) in bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(). This anchors the base of\nthe JIT buffer to an 8-byte boundary, allowing the relative padding math\nin build_plt() to correctly align the target field.",
  "id": "GHSA-887m-4qrh-hjq5",
  "modified": "2026-04-02T15:31:36Z",
  "published": "2026-03-25T12:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23383"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/519b1ad91de5bf7a496f2b858e9212db6328e1de"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66959ed481a474eaae278c7f6860a2a9b188a4d6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80ad264da02cc4aee718e799c2b79f0f834673dc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ef06fd16d48704eac868441d98d4ef083d8f3d07"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…