ghsa-7xwf-9vvh-fpw4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-03-22 09:30
Modified
2025-03-22 09:30
Severity ?
VLAI Severity ?
Details
The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_assign_fonts_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete font assignments via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-13768" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-352" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-22T07:15:23Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_assign_fonts_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete font assignments via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.", "id": "GHSA-7xwf-9vvh-fpw4", "modified": "2025-03-22T09:30:32Z", "published": "2025-03-22T09:30:32Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13768" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/cits-support-svg-webp-media-upload/trunk/includes/cits-custom-fonts.php" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/ea1f1825-241c-4060-a1e1-a13f92421fef?source=cve" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Loading…