GHSA-7RHJ-Q792-J2VW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:23 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:23
VLAI
Details
The server in Toribash 2.71 and earlier does not properly handle long commands, which allows remote attackers to trigger a protocol violation in which data is sent to other clients without a required LF character, as demonstrated by a SAY command. NOTE: the security impact of this violation is not clear, although it probably makes exploitation of CVE-2007-4449 easier.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4450"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-08-21T00:17:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The server in Toribash 2.71 and earlier does not properly handle long commands, which allows remote attackers to trigger a protocol violation in which data is sent to other clients without a required LF character, as demonstrated by a SAY command. NOTE: the security impact of this violation is not clear, although it probably makes exploitation of CVE-2007-4449 easier.",
"id": "GHSA-7rhj-q792-j2vw",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:23:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:23:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://aluigi.org/poc/toribashish.zip"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/26507"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3033"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/477025/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25359"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
Loading…
Loading…